The Gershgorin circle theorem (where “Gershgorin” is sometimes also spelled ” Gersgorin” or “Gerschgorin”) identifies a region in the complex plane that. Does every disk have its own eigenvalue? NO but. Theorem. Let A = [aij ] be an n × n complex matrix. If Di1,Di2,,Dik are Gershgorin discs of A that are. Aug 9, The Gershgorin disc theorem is an elementary result that allows you to make very fast deductions about the locations of eigenvalues.

Author: | Fezil JoJok |

Country: | Latvia |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Life |

Published (Last): | 14 December 2014 |

Pages: | 358 |

PDF File Size: | 18.59 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 8.8 Mb |

ISBN: | 713-7-67742-243-7 |

Downloads: | 82767 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | Mozshura |

They ought to look great in any standards-compliant modern browser. Unfortunately, they will probably look horrible in older browsers, like Netscape 4.

Moreover, many posts use MathML, which is, currently only supported in Mozilla. My best suggestion and you will thank me when surfing an ever-increasing number of sites on the web which have been crafted to use the new standards is to upgrade to the latest version of your browser.

## Gershgorin circle theorem

If that’s not possible, consider thsorem to the Standards-compliant and open-source Mozilla browser. The Gershgorin disc theorem is an elementary result that allows you to make very fast deductions about the locations of eigenvalues. For instance, it lets you look at the matrix.

I feel ever so slightly resentful about it. The theorem is so useful, and the proof is a pushover.

## Gershgorin Circle Theorem

Was it just me? Did you get taught the Gershgorin disc theorem as an undergraduate? Then every eigenvalue of A A lies in one of the Gershgorin discs. My statement about real and imaginary parts follows immediately. Even the proof is pathetically simple.

### Gershgorin circle theorem – Wikipedia

The theorem is often stated with a supplementary part that gives further information about the location of the eigenvalues: But the theorem says nothing about where those two eigenvalues are within that union. But the main part is entirely elementary in both its statement and its proof, as well as being immediately useful.

Do you know any nice applications of it? Any square matrix A A whose diagonal entries are big enough relative to the rest of the row precisely: For any square matrix, we get an upper bound on the absolute values of the eigenvalues: By Gershgorin, every eigenvalue is in the interval 02 0, 2. The theorem facilitated calculation of the eigenvalues. Right — lots of people do call it that.

The canonical text Matrix Analysis of Horn and Johnson also calls it that. I was not taught this theorem as an undergraduate, but came across it in an economics paper soon later. I wrote a blog post about this: Let me repeat what you wrote for anyone too lazy to click. I observed that Levy—Desplanques is an easy consequence of Gershgorin since if A A satisfies the hypotheses of theorwm L-D theorem then none of the discs contains 0 0.

Gershgorin is also an easy consequence of Levy—Desplanques! I seem to have hit on something important. Thelrem are two main recurring themes which the reader will see in this book.

The first recurring theme is that a nonsingularity theorem for matrices gives rise to an equivalent eigenvalue inclusion set in the complex plane for matrices, and conversely.

He gives an example later on: I wonder what other examples there are. Nice — thanks a lot! If I put in the matrix of my post, Gfrshgorin get this picture:. On the other hand, the picture shows five non-circular brown regions.

This was still hard for me to understand what was going on, so I got the code from the github repository and hacked it a bit to display the three ovals in different colors as is being done to the disks right nowand it resulted in this:.

Huge thanks for this! I spent a weekend mostly unplugged from the internet, and plugged back in to find that people had written all sorts of wonderful things in reply to my posts. A Gershgorib oval is a quartic plane curve defined as the set or locus of points in gershgoin plane such that the product of the distances to two fixed points is constant.

This may be contrasted to an ellipse, for which the sum of the distances is constant, rather than the product. But I slightly regret it.

I think there are twice the number of ovals present, because we can choose to sum theoeem either rows or columns. If you turn off the Ovals, you can thoerem 6 discs of Gerschgorin, too, pairs of which are concentric! The course I teach is for students entering directly into the second year of our degree programme.

If I remember correctly, I was taught this theorem in the second year during the basic numerical analysis course. Maybe some application in numerical analysis were given, but to be sure I would have to dig up my old notebook. But I liked her ultimate verdict. I used the theorem many many years ago to prove that nuclear reactor oscillations could not be caused by just neutron coupling of the various core regions.

I exaggerate… at least a little! I definitely never learned the Gershgorin theorem as an undergraduate, or in any class.

I did a lot of reading about matrix analysis when I was a grad student and postdoc. Personally I never mention it in undergraduate linear algebra, but I yheorem teach it in a graduate Matrix Analysis course. I think setting some problems about it is a nice idea, partly because it makes a valuable point — that you can extract some nontrivial information about invariant quantities eigenvalues associated to a matrix quite directly from the highly non-invariant matrix entries.

Incidentally, since we wrote the paper you linked to above, I noticed an argument for our theorem that bypasses Gershgorin. Exercise for the reader: Adapt the argument above to prove the Levy—Desplanques theorem, and hence the Gershgorin theorem. Why the emphasis on dominance in each row?

Surely also looking at the columns as well valid because transposes have the same eigenvalues would sometimes help. When you switch from rows to columns, some discs gershhorin get smaller… but then others must get bigger.

Write G G for the union of those three discs. When you switch from rows to columns, the first disc grows, the second shrinks, and the third stays the same. In this case, both sums are 8 8. There are related theorems that look at the rows and columns simultaneously. Post a New Comment. Search for other entries: In Praise of the Gershgorin Disc Theorem. Qiaochu Yuan on August 9, 7: Tom Leinster on August 9, 7: David Austin on August 10, 1: Tom Leinster on August 10, 1: In Praise of the Gershgorin Disc Theorem I was not taught this theorem as an undergraduate, but came across it in an economics paper soon later.

ShreevatsaR on August 10, 4: Tom Leinster on August 11, 2: ShreevatsaR on August 13, 2: Tom Leinster on August 13, 3: ShreevatsaR on August 13, 6: ShreevatsaR on August 13, 9: Tom Leinster on August yheorem, Phalguni on July 31, 5: Julie on August 10, 5: Tom Leinster on August 12, 1: Wes Harker on August 11, Mark Meckes on August 19, 2: Tom Leinster on August 21, 4: Mark Meckes on August 22, 3: Aaron Denney on September hteorem, Tom Leinster on September 16, Mark Meckes on September 16, 5: